Ah - the sound of raging conservatives and cheering liberals. What could it be?
The anxiously awaited nomination of President Bush's nominee to the United States Supreme Court to replace the retiring Sandra Day O' Connor.
Today President Bush nominated White House counsel (i.e. "his" lawyer and the person he consults with on nominations like these) Harriet Miers. "She will strictly interpret our Constitution and laws. She will not legislate from the bench," Bush said. Authors note: A post on "legislating from the bench" appeared on this blog back in July, and can can be viewed here
Miers has never been a judge, and said she was grateful and humbled by the nomination.
I'll bet. I've never been a judge. I'd be "grateful," and "humbled" to be nominated to the highest court in the land based on my job as counsel to the nominator.
Is she qualified? Who knows. What does it mean to be qualified? To conservatives, she's qualified if she stands on the top of the capitol today and says "Down with Roe v. Wade!" To them, she is now not qualified, solely because they do not know the answer to that question.
To liberals, she's a bit more qualified solely because she has not had any decisions that would indicate her position, therefore, hell, maybe she's not so conservative.
Hey liberals - SHE'S THE PRESIDENT'S LAWYER. ARE YOU AWAKE AND BREATHING?
Both sides today are showing their shallowness. The Supreme Court is only about abortion to those making the most public statements on both sides.
Mind you, the Supreme Court recently held that private property could be taken for commercial purposes, sending everyone into a tailspin. "Hey, I thought the Supreme Court only handled abortion cases," you could hear them saying.
These are the people who represent the old phrase: "While you're watching the mice, the elephant walks out of the room."
This one will be fun.
4 hours ago