The issue here is not whether the officer's conduct was improper. Jackie probably shocked her readers by saying she won't sue, but she knows better - the only damage is to her perception of the world, so who cares. Her moment "in the client's shoes" is something that will make her a better lawyer, and her clients will appreciate the passion of a lawyer who can say "I've been there."
The issue is faulty eyewitness testimony.
Tonight (Friday) Chris Hansen will discuss the topic of faulty eyewitness testimony on Dateline NBC. I saw a preview this morning, and it looks like something everyone should watch that thinks eyewitness testimony means anything.
Brian Tannebaum is a criminal defense lawyer in Miami, Florida practicing in state and federal court, and the author of The Truth About Hiring A Criminal Defense Lawyer.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce29f/ce29f311028df26fb37afbee9a21a93107ba4d2b" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23e48/23e487ef36aed32dfdfa76c2d8b2d4ca2adeeceb" alt="okdork.com rules"
Your readers might also be interested in this Masters Report from the New Jersey Supreme Court:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/pressrel/HENDERSON%20FINAL%20BRIEF%20.PDF%20%2800621142%29.PDF