Texas is going to execute Hank Skinner today. Like any defendant condemmed to death, he's not a sympathetic fellow. He was convicted of killing his girlfriend and her two sons on New Year's Eve. Of course because a jury said he did it, he did it. Any scientific evidence to the contrary is just a nuisance.
But there is DNA that hasn't been tested.
Hank Skinner wants it tested, and he's asking the U.S. Supreme Court and Governor Rick Perry to intervene. Skinner asked the Texas Board of Pardon and Paroles, but they said "no."
Skinner's defense lawyer spits in the wind: "I can't think of any good reason why you would refuse to do DNA testing in a case where there is other strong evidence pointing to innocence," Skinner's attorney Rob Owen told AFP.
"If I were a prosecutor I wouldn't want to put someone to death before I was absolutely sure -- and in this case, the DNA testing is what we need to be sure."
Eh. We've got ourselves an execution today. Talk of possible innocence is distracting.
Some students at Northwestern looked at the case and compared DNA - they determined that although at his trial there was DNA showing he was in the house where the murders occurred, Skinner was innocent.
Add that to no confession or eyewitnesses, no motive or record of a violent past on Skinner's part, and it sounds like that pesky DNA should be tested.
Seventeen death row inmates have been released after DNA testing proved their innocence.
But hey, everyone catch Idol last night?
Brian Tannebaum is a criminal defense lawyer in Miami, Florida practicing in state and federal court, and the author of The Truth About Hiring A Criminal Defense Lawyer.
Post to Twitter
36 minutes ago